বুধবার, ১৩ই মে ২০২৬, ৩০শে বৈশাখ ১৪৩৩ | E-Paper
Breaking news:
  • সারাদেশে জেলা ও উপজেলা প্রতিনিধি নিয়োগ করা হচ্ছে। আগ্রহী হলে আপনার সিভি ই-মেইল করতে পারেন। ই-মেইল edailyvoa@gmail.com
News Headlines:
  • Police administration belongs to no party, will operate under the law: PM
  • Can NCP progress while remaining aligned with Jamaat?
  • Masud Uddin behind inhumane acts during 1/11 govt: Chief Prosecutor
  • Eviction Drive by Roads and Highways Department at Kesharhat Market
  • Children received neither vaccines nor vitamin A, measles deaths rising also due to malnutrition
  • Suvendu Adhikari takes oath as West Bengal's first BJP CM, PM Modi and Amit Shah attend
  • 5 members of a family found slaughtered in Kapasia, head of household absconding: Police
  • Tarique Rahman joins views-exchange meeting with BNP dist-level leaders
  • Trump announces three-day Ukraine-Russia ceasefire
  • World Cup to hold trio of opening ceremonies in Mexico, the US, and Canada

SC scraps case against CA Yunus

Online Desk

Published:
২৩ এপ্রিল ২০২৫, ১২:৩৮

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court today (April 23) scrapped the framing of charges and all proceedings in a money laundering case filed against Chief Advisor Dr Muhammad Yunus, Chairman of Grameen Telecom, and six officials of the company.

A bench led by Chief Justice Syed Refaat Ahmed delivered the unanimous verdict in the morning, allowing an appeal filed by Dr Yunus that challenged a previous order from the High Court.

Attorney General AM Amin Uddin represented the state, while Yunus was defended by Barrister Abdullah Al Mamun.

Advocate Asif Hossain appeared on behalf of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC).

The case was originally filed on 30 May 2023 by ACC Deputy Director Gulshan Anwar Pradhan under the Money Laundering Prevention Act.

Yunus and 13 others were accused of misappropriating Tk25.22 crore from the Workers’ Profit Participation Fund and allegedly transferring the funds illegally.

Following the conclusion of hearings on March 19, the Appellate Division had fixed April 23 for the delivery of its verdict, ultimately bringing a close to a case that had drawn significant public attention.


Comment:

Related news